Oregon State
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
121  Emily Weber SR 20:06
314  Kristiane Width JR 20:35
318  Juliana Mount SO 20:36
810  Lexi Reed FR 21:19
964  Sara Christianson FR 21:29
979  Samantha Lewis SR 21:30
1,058  Morgan Anderson SR 21:36
1,726  Sam McKinnon SO 22:16
1,920  Nicole Goecke SO 22:29
2,293  Kala Kopecek JR 22:54
National Rank #65 of 344
West Region Rank #11 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.1%
Most Likely Finish 11th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 15.5%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Emily Weber Kristiane Width Juliana Mount Lexi Reed Sara Christianson Samantha Lewis Morgan Anderson Sam McKinnon Nicole Goecke Kala Kopecek
Joe Piane Invitational (Blue) 09/30 927 20:23 20:33 20:29 21:26 21:38 21:54 22:04
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (Open) 10/15 21:57
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (White) 10/15 864 19:56 20:32 20:41 21:12 21:14 21:56 22:09
Pac-12 Conference 10/28 806 20:00 20:27 20:26 21:10 21:41 21:01 21:26 22:46 22:51 23:13
West Region Championships 11/11 964 20:07 20:35 21:28 21:36 21:24 21:16 22:35





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.1% 28.0 617 0.1 0.1 0.1
Region Championship 100% 11.5 375 0.1 0.1 0.6 2.7 12.1 38.5 30.2 10.9 2.8 1.4 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emily Weber 11.3% 82.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Kristiane Width 0.1% 132.5
Juliana Mount 0.2% 185.0
Lexi Reed 0.1% 229.5
Sara Christianson 0.1% 237.5
Samantha Lewis 0.1% 209.5
Morgan Anderson 0.1% 239.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emily Weber 31.7 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.5 2.3 2.7 1.8 3.1 3.1 2.9
Kristiane Width 60.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
Juliana Mount 61.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
Lexi Reed 107.3
Sara Christianson 121.8
Samantha Lewis 122.8
Morgan Anderson 130.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 0.1% 100.0% 0.1 0.1 6
7 0.1% 50.0% 0.1 0.1 0.1 7
8 0.6% 8.3% 0.1 0.6 0.1 8
9 2.7% 2.7 9
10 12.1% 12.1 10
11 38.5% 38.5 11
12 30.2% 30.2 12
13 10.9% 10.9 13
14 2.8% 2.8 14
15 1.4% 1.4 15
16 0.6% 0.6 16
17 0.1% 0.1 17
18 0.2% 0.2 18
19 0.1% 0.1 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.2% 0.1 0.1 99.9 0.0 0.2




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Wake Forest 2.4% 1.0 0.0
Clemson 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0